The Unsettling Trend of Big Churches Absorbing Small Ones: A Personal Perspective

 

As someone who pastors a rural church, I have noticed a trend that has been quietly gaining momentum in recent years: large churches are absorbing smaller ones. While this may seem like a practical solution to some, I have reservations about this trend for several reasons. 

Firstly, the potential loss of local identity and community is a major concern. Small churches often serve as the heart of local communities, providing a close-knit, family-like atmosphere where everyone knows and supports each other. This sense of community can easily be diluted in a merger with a larger church, as the smaller church's identity is absorbed into the larger entity. 

This would be similar to a missionary from the United States starting a new work in a Zulu nation and trying to get them to adapt to the American way of doing church. 

Secondly, smaller churches often have unique traditions, worship styles, and ministries tailored specifically to their local context. A merger can lead to the loss or significant alteration of these cherished aspects, causing a sense of grief and disconnect among the congregation.

Another concern is the centralization of power and leadership within larger churches. With their complex structures, holding leaders accountable becomes more challenging. The leadership style may shift towards a more corporate, CEO-like approach, potentially diminishing the pastoral role that nurtures and shepherds individual members. 

Moreover, the focus on a few key leaders or paid professionals in large churches can limit opportunities for ordinary members to engage in leadership and ministry. This can leave the congregation feeling disconnected and undervalued.

The focus on numbers and resources in larger churches can also be problematic. The temptation to prioritize numerical growth and utilize marketing strategies can overshadow the deeper focus on biblical teachings and spiritual growth. Resources, including finances and personnel, may be reallocated towards attracting new members rather than on specific local outreach or missions that the smaller church previously prioritized.

Lastly, for struggling churches, the act of merging can feel like an admission of defeat and a loss of autonomy. Differences in theological perspectives, traditions, or cultural norms can create friction and make it difficult to establish a truly unified and harmonious congregation.

While it's important to acknowledge that not all mergers are inherently problematic, and there can be valid motivations and positive outcomes, such as revitalizing struggling congregations or expanding reach into new communities, the potential drawbacks cannot be ignored.

Roughly 15 years ago, I was approached by a lay leader from the church I was on staff at in Milwaukee. They were going through a transition and wondered if I might submit my resume and come back. My reply was, “you wouldn’t want me back.” Among the reasons why, one was that I would sell the building and we would go through a restart phase using a rented space to get back on track. I have been very vocal in other blogs as to why I was not onboard with the purchase of a building while I was on staff there and over the years (though in the early days I was seen as a person that lacked faith) it has become evident as to why I was not on board. However, my plan would have been to restart by taking a few steps back but not be overtaken by a larger church. 

Navigating these changes with sensitivity to the concerns of all involved is critical for a truly healthy and beneficial union. As we reflect on this trend, let's remember the unique value and irreplaceable role our smaller churches play in our communities and in our hearts.